WP:ALBUM

The following is a list of some websites with reviews or links to reviews that can be used to source critical reception sections in album articles, and to add ratings to the Album ratings template. Additional sites and sources may also be used, provided they meet the criteria at Reliable sources and WP:ALBUMS. Specifically, reviews should be written by professional music journalists or DJs, or found within any online or print publication having a (paid or volunteer) editorial and writing staff (which excludes personal blogs), and must be from a source that is independent of the artist, record company, etc.

Metacritic
Metacritic can be used to give an aggregate score of an album's reception. However, avoid citing the review excerpts listed below the aggregate score; Instead, seek out the reviews in full and cite them individually. Album ratings has a  parameter that can be used to display Metacritic's aggregate score for an album. When describing the score in prose, be sure to note that the score is an aggregate and how many reviews it is based on. For example:

Non-professional reviews
As a matter of policy, reviews from these sources are not considered professional and should not be included, either in Album ratings or in the article's prose:
 * Amazon.com
 * Encyclopaedia Metallum
 * Epinions
 * Rate Your Music
 * Ultimate Guitar Archive
 * Metal Storms guest reviews, recognizable by a tag, or staff reviews from before 2009
 * www.metal-observer.com
 * www.bnrmetal.com
 * www.seaoftranquility.org
 * soundofmetal.se
 * www.thetunemusic.com
 * Prog Archives
 * Sputnikmusic's non-staff reviews
 * Punknews.org's non-staff reviews
 * www.firestream.net

Reviews and ratings which only summarize other reviews and ratings should not be included either:
 * Artistdirect's reviews from Allmusic